Why open robotics matters more than ever
Figure, Tesla, 1X — the humanoid race is closed-source. Here's why the open movement is still the one that wins.
Figure, Tesla Optimus, 1X NEO. The headlines in 2026 are loud and the demos are real. What's missing: the source code.
The closed wave
Commercial humanoids are beautiful engineering. They're also — every single one — closed. Proprietary firmware, proprietary training pipelines, proprietary hardware that can't be repaired without an NDA. The ChatGPT moment for physical AI is happening inside vaults.
The open wave
Meanwhile: K-Scale Labs ships an $8,999 open-source humanoid with a Python SDK. Pollen Robotics' Reachy Mini lands on HuggingFace. Poppy Project's 3D-printed skeletons run in classrooms worldwide. Every one of these communities is standing on the shoulders of ROS, Gazebo, PyBullet, Rapier — open hardware, open models, open data.
The compounding advantage
Closed companies win on capital. Open communities win on time. Every commit, every URDF, every ROS bag accumulates — and nobody has to ask permission to start. That's the advantage a hobbyist with a soldering iron has over a trillion-dollar company: the right to experiment without a legal review.
What this means for RobotForge
We lean open. Tutorials are free and remixable. Simulator code is Apache 2.0. The courses cost money — because someone has to pay rent — but the tools they teach you are ones you can use forever without paying us again.
Liked this?
Get a new one in your inbox. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.